Gossett v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.

2014 Ark. App. 1
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 8, 2014
DocketCV-13-584
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2014 Ark. App. 1 (Gossett v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gossett v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., 2014 Ark. App. 1 (Ark. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 1

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CV-13-584

Opinion Delivered January 8, 2014 HEATHER GOSSETT APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE SCOTT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. JV-2011-40] V. HONORABLE TERRY SULLIVAN, JUDGE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and MINOR CHILDREN AFFIRMED; MOTION TO APPELLEES WITHDRAW GRANTED

ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Chief Judge

The Scott County Circuit Court terminated appellant Heather Gossett’s parental rights

in her minor children, M.G. (d/o/b September 27, 2007) and D.G. (d/o/b October 7, 2008)

on April 23, 2013. Appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a

no-merit brief pursuant to Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 359 Ark.

131, 194 S.W.3d 739 (2004), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6-9(i) (2013), stating that

there are no issues of arguable merit for appeal. We agree.

The clerk of this court sent copies of counsel’s motion and brief to appellant at the

address counsel provided in the certificate of service in the motion to be relieved, informing

her that she had the right to file pro se points for reversal. Appellant filed a single page of pro

se points, but neither the Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS) nor the ad litem

attorney have chosen to file a brief in response. Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 1

After carefully examining the record, the brief presented to us, and appellant’s pro se

points, we conclude that counsel has complied with the requirements established by the

Arkansas Supreme Court for no-merit appeals in termination cases and that the appeal is

wholly without merit. Accordingly, we affirm by memorandum opinion the order

terminating appellant’s parental rights in M.G. and D.G. See In re Memorandum Opinions, 16

Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985); Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 5-2(e) (2013). Counsel’s motion to

withdraw is granted.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

PITTMAN and WHITEAKER, JJ., agree.

Leah Lanford, Arkansas Public Defender Commission, for appellant.

No response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. White
2014 Ark. App. 628 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ark. App. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gossett-v-ark-dept-of-human-servs-arkctapp-2014.