Goshayeshi v. Mehrabian
Opinion
In this direct appeal following an arbitration award, appellant/ defendant Mohammed Goshayeshi challenges a Cobb County trial [82] court’s order granting plaintiff/appellee’s application to compel arbitration. Appellant asserts that he did not consent in writing to binding arbitration. It is for this reason also that appellant contends the trial court erred in subsequently affirming the arbitration award.
“The grant of an application to compel arbitration is not directly appealable pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (4), but is instead an interlocutory matter reviewable pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). [Cits.] A party seeking appellate review from an interlocutory order must follow the interlocutory application procedure set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), which includes obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court. [Cit.]” Pace Constr. Corp. v. Northpark Assn., 215 Ga. App. 438, 439 (450 SE2d 828) (1994). The correctness of this mandatory procedure is illustrated no more clearly than in this case, wherein the record shows that appellant failed to take any affirmative action to stay arbitration proceedings prior to the trial court’s order or to contest arbitration proceedings after the trial court’s order.1
Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed. The order to compel arbitration from which Goshayeshi appeals is not a final judgment, and he failed to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Pace, supra at 439; McAllaster v. Merrill Lynch &c., 212 Ga. App. 697 (443 SE2d 9) (1994).
Appeal dismissed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
501 S.E.2d 265 (Goshayeshi v. Mehrabian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.