Gorman v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.

80 S.E. 553, 141 Ga. 125, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 349
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 12, 1913·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

Where a bill of exceptions fails to show any service thereof upon the opposite party or his counsel, or any acknowledgment or waiver of service, and the only showing as to service is an affidavit accompanying the brief of counsel for plaintiffs in error, to the effect that, within the time required by law, he forwarded by registered mail to the address of counsel for defendant in error a copy of the bill of exceptions and received a return registry receipt therefor signed by an agent of such counsel (which receipt is attached to the affidavit), the writ of error will be dismissed. Civil Code, § 6160; Albritton v. Tygart, 139 Ga. 231 (77 S. E. 28).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gorman v. Central of Georgia Railway Co., 80 S.E. 553, 141 Ga. 125, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 349 (Ga. 1913).

80 S.E. 553 (Gorman v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hardy v. Bank of Ila
20 S.E.2d 94 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Ownby v. Wager
16 S.E.2d 906 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Cleveland v. Wacaster
198 S.E. 708 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Morgan v. Greenberg
173 S.E. 236 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Cox v. Gulp Guano Co.
94 S.E. 582 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)