Cleveland v. Wacaster

198 S.E. 708, 186 Ga. 662, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 654
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 16, 1938
DocketNo. 12426
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 S.E. 708 (Cleveland v. Wacaster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleveland v. Wacaster, 198 S.E. 708, 186 Ga. 662, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 654 (Ga. 1938).

Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.

Where the bill of exceptions shows only a “certificate of service” signed by an attorney for the plaintiff in error, as follows: “This is to certify that I have this day mailed a copy of the within bill of exceptions, properly addressed, to the attorneys of record for the defendants in error specified in this bill of exceptions,” and no other sei'viee, or acknowledgment of service, or waiver of service appears, the writ of error will be dismissed on motion. Code, § 6-911; Clark v. [663]*663Lyon, 48 Ga. 125; Albritton v. Tygart, 139 Ga. 231 (77 S. E. 28); Presley v. Jones, 139 Ga. 814 (78 S. E. 126); Gorman v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co., 141 Ga. 125 (80 S. E. 553); Ray v. Hardman, 146 Ga. 718 (92 S. E. 211).

No. 12426. September 16, 1938. Fugene Spradlin and Watkins, Grant & Watkins, for plaintiffs. Henderson d Spence and Samuel D. Heivlett, for defendants.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cauley v. Godwin
116 S.E.2d 535 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 S.E. 708, 186 Ga. 662, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-v-wacaster-ga-1938.