Cleveland v. Wacaster

198 S.E. 708, 186 Ga. 662, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 654
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 16, 1938·No. No. 12426·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.

Where the bill of exceptions shows only a “certificate of service” signed by an attorney for the plaintiff in error, as follows: “This is to certify that I have this day mailed a copy of the within bill of exceptions, properly addressed, to the attorneys of record for the defendants in error specified in this bill of exceptions,” and no other sei'viee, or acknowledgment of service, or waiver of service appears, the writ of error will be dismissed on motion. Code, § 6-911; Clark v. [663]*663Lyon, 48 Ga. 125; Albritton v. Tygart, 139 Ga. 231 (77 S. E. 28); Presley v. Jones, 139 Ga. 814 (78 S. E. 126); Gorman v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co., 141 Ga. 125 (80 S. E. 553); Ray v. Hardman, 146 Ga. 718 (92 S. E. 211).

No. 12426. September 16, 1938. Fugene Spradlin and Watkins, Grant & Watkins, for plaintiffs. Henderson d Spence and Samuel D. Heivlett, for defendants.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleveland v. Wacaster, 198 S.E. 708, 186 Ga. 662, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 654 (Ga. 1938).

198 S.E. 708 (Cleveland v. Wacaster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cauley v. Godwin
116 S.E.2d 535 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)