Gore v. Humphries

134 S.E. 479, 162 Ga. 653, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 260
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gore v. Humphries. Read the opinion of the Court — 163 Ga. 106
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 14, 1926·No. No. 5638·Published

Opinions

Pee Curiam.

Upon considering the application for mandamus in this ease it is ordered: that a mandamus nisi issue; that the Honorable John D. Humphries, judge of the superior court of Pulton County, will show cause in writing on the 5th day of October, 1926, at 3 o’clock p. m., why the mandamus nisi should not be made absolute. The court having taken jurisdiction of this matter and granted a mandamus nisi, it is further ordered that this order shall operate as a supersedeas to the order for the execution of the applicant until the further order of this court. A copy of this order will be transmitted to his honor John D. Humphries, judge of the superior court of Pulton County, so that he may give such direction as will prevent the execution of the applicant on this date.

All the Justices concur, except Beeh, P. J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gore v. Humphries, 134 S.E. 479, 162 Ga. 653, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 260 (Ga. 1926).

134 S.E. 479 (Gore v. Humphries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.