Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Gore v. Humphries

Gore v. Humphries

135 S.E. 926, 163 Ga. 118, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 1
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 24, 1923
DocketNo. 5733
StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.E. 926 (Gore v. Humphries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gore v. Humphries, 135 S.E. 926, 163 Ga. 118, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 1 (Ga. 1923).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Upon consideration of the application for mandamus nisi in the above-stated case, the same is denied.

All the Justices concur, except Atlcinson and Sines, JJ., dissenting. Reuben A. Garland, Louis S. Maritzer, W. A. James, and Linton S. James, for movant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S.E. 926, 163 Ga. 118, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gore-v-humphries-ga-1923.