Gore v. Humphries

Supreme Court of Georgia

Gore v. Humphries

135 S.E. 926, 163 Ga. 118, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 1

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gore v. Humphries. Read the opinion of the Court — 163 Ga. 106 →

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 24, 1923·No. No. 5733·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Upon consideration of the application for mandamus nisi in the above-stated case, the same is denied.

All the Justices concur, except Atlcinson and Sines, JJ., dissenting. Reuben A. Garland, Louis S. Maritzer, W. A. James, and Linton S. James, for movant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gore v. Humphries, 135 S.E. 926, 163 Ga. 118, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 1 (Ga. 1923).

Pincite

135 S.E. 926 (Gore v. Humphries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.