Gordon v. State

582 So. 2d 91, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6803, 1991 WL 115164
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gordon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 528 So. 2d 910
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 1991·No. No. 89-2263·Published

Opinion

SHIVERS, Chief Judge.

Gordon appeals his judgment and sentence; and we affirm. We note, however, that Gordon’s scoresheet apparently scores convictions from Massachusetts as a felony or misdemeanor depending on Massachusetts law instead of Florida law. That is incorrect. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(5)(a)(2) states that when scoring out-of-state convictions, the score for the analogous or parallel Florida statute must be assigned. See also, Forehand v. State, 537 So.2d 103 (Fla.1989), aff'g 524 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). We nevertheless affirm because a corrected score-sheet would not change the recommended sentence, which Gordon received.

ERVIN and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gordon v. State, 582 So. 2d 91, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6803, 1991 WL 115164 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

582 So. 2d 91 (Gordon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Forehand v. State
537 So. 2d 103 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Forehand v. State
524 So. 2d 1054 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)