Gordon v. State
530 So. 2d 1113, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2192, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4120, 1988 WL 96459
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 22, 1988·No. No. 88-238·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Gordon appeals from the trial court’s order summarily denying his 3.850 motion, in which he claims the trial court erred in imposing court costs1 because he was not given adequate prior notice and he was indigent. Under Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla.1984), the imposition of costs was improper, and the state here concedes error. Accordingly, we strike the cost assessment and remand for their imposition, at the trial court’s discretion, after due notice and hearing. See Hollis v. State, 525 So.2d 498 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gordon v. State, 530 So. 2d 1113, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2192, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4120, 1988 WL 96459 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
530 So. 2d 1113 (Gordon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Larsen v. State
543 So. 2d 359 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)