Gordon v. State

587 So. 2d 435, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1379, 1991 WL 186799
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedAugust 23, 1991
Docket8 Div. 496
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 587 So. 2d 435 (Gordon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gordon v. State, 587 So. 2d 435, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1379, 1991 WL 186799 (Ala. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

AFTER REMAND PROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Charles Wayne Gordon, was convicted of capital murder and was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. On appeal to this court we affirmed the appellant’s conviction, stating that the appellant, a white male, had no standing to raise a Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), violation since he was not a member [436]*436of a cognizable racial group. See Gordon v. State, [Ms. 8 Div. 496, May 25, 1990], 587 So.2d 427 (Ala.Cr.App.1990). Our Supreme Court reversed our judgment in this case, stating that:

“The Supreme Court of the United States in Powers v. Ohio, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 1364, 113 L.Ed.2d 411 (1991), held that white defendants do have standing to challenge the state’s use of peremptory challenges to remove black jurors from a petit jury.”

Ex parte Gordon, 587 So.2d 434, 435 (Ala.1991).

On the authority of Ex parte Gordon, we remand this case to the Circuit Court for Madison County so that the trial court can hold a Batson hearing in which the prosecution will present its reasons for its strikes of prospective black jurors. If the prosecution cannot provide racially neutral reasons, then the appellant must receive a new trial. Due return should be filed with this court within 90 days from the date of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Riley v. State
166 So. 3d 705 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2013)
Revis v. State
101 So. 3d 247 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2011)
Reynolds v. State
114 So. 3d 61 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2010)
Lee v. State
898 So. 2d 790 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2003)
Broadnax v. State
825 So. 2d 134 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2000)
Perkins v. State
808 So. 2d 1041 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1999)
Jackson v. State
836 So. 2d 915 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1999)
Loggins v. State
771 So. 2d 1070 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1999)
Davis v. State
718 So. 2d 1148 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1997)
Arthur v. State
711 So. 2d 1031 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1996)
Bush v. State
695 So. 2d 70 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1996)
Slaton v. State
680 So. 2d 879 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1995)
Gordon v. State
591 So. 2d 149 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
587 So. 2d 435, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1379, 1991 WL 186799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-state-alacrimapp-1991.