Gordon v. Mullins

Fourth Circuit

Gordon v. Mullins

582 F. App'x 248

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 2, 2014·No. No. 14-6497·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carl D. Gordon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gordon v. Mullins, No. 7:12-cv-00494-NKM-RSB, 2014 WL 1118199 (W.D.Va. Mar. 20, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Carl D. Gordon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gordon v. Mullins, No. 7:12-cv-00494-NKM-RSB, 2014 WL 1118199 (W.D.Va. Mar. 20, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Gordon v. Mullins, 582 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

582 F. App'x 248 (Gordon v. Mullins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related