Czekalski v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner
Opinion
Jason A. Czekalski v. Case No. 18-cv-592-PB NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated March 2, 2020, and deny plaintiff’s “Motion for Expedited/Emergency Protective Order for Evidence and/or Legal Resources” (Doc. No. 72). “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v.
Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). __/_s_/_P_a_u_l_ _B_a_r_b_a_d_o_r_o__________ Paul Barbadoro United States District Judge Date: April 10, 2020 cc: Jason A. Czekalski, pro se Counsel of Record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Czekalski v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner (Czekalski v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.