Gordon v. Bright

Tenth Circuit

Gordon v. Bright

419 F.2d 835

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided November 24, 1969·No. No. 10160·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was employed as a technical instructor by the Federal Aviation Agency at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. He had been given advance notice of proposed removal from government service for unsatisfactory performance and, after failing to improve, was involuntarily removed in 1966. After exhausting his administrative remedies Gordon sought judicial review in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, contending that his dismissal was arbitrary, capricious and an abuse of discretion. That court affirmed his dismissal and this appeal followed.

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s well-reasoned memorandum opinion, 306 F.Supp. 252 (W.D. Okla.1968).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was employed as a technical instructor by the Federal Aviation Agency at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. He had been given advance notice of proposed removal from government service for unsatisfactory performance and, after failing to improve, was involuntarily removed in 1966. After exhausting his administrative remedies Gordon sought judicial review in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, contending that his dismissal was arbitrary, capricious and an abuse of discretion. That court affirmed his dismissal and this appeal followed.

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s well-reasoned memorandum opinion, 306 F.Supp. 252 (W.D. Okla.1968).

Gordon v. Bright, 419 F.2d 835 (10th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

419 F.2d 835 (Gordon v. Bright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related