GORDON CRITTENDON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
GORDON CRITTENDON, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
Nos. 4D18-2808 and 4D18-2969
[November 29, 2018]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 31-2014-CF-001298A and 31-2015- CF-000199A.
Gordon Crittendon, Monticello, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
GORDON CRITTENDON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (GORDON CRITTENDON v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.