GORDON CRITTENDON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 2018·No. 18-2969·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

GORDON CRITTENDON, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Nos. 4D18-2808 and 4D18-2969

[November 29, 2018]

Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 31-2014-CF-001298A and 31-2015- CF-000199A.

Gordon Crittendon, Monticello, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GORDON CRITTENDON v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

GORDON CRITTENDON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (GORDON CRITTENDON v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.