GORDON CRITTENDON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 21, 2018·No. 18-2792·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

GORDON CRITTENDON, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2792

[November 21, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 312014CF001298A, 312015CF000199A.

Gordon Crittendon, Monticello, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GORDON CRITTENDON v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

GORDON CRITTENDON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (GORDON CRITTENDON v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.