Goodwin v. Anderson
This text of 12 S.E.2d 444 (Goodwin v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The plaintiff in error brings this case here for review, first, on the general grounds; and, second, on exceptions to the charge of the trial court.
1. The jury was authorized to find, under the evidence, that the defendant officer did not so much as put his hands on the plaintiff or receive any article of property from her, notwithstanding her testimony to the contrary. The evidence supported the verdict.
2. While the judge’s charge to the jury may contain inaccuracies of statement, none of the objections to it point to any material error which would warrant a reversal.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 S.E.2d 444, 64 Ga. App. 99, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodwin-v-anderson-gactapp-1940.