Goodman v. Temple Shir Ami, Inc.
737 So. 2d 1077, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 382, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 1182, 1999 WL 459752
Opinion
We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Goodman v. Temple Shir Ami, Inc., 712 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), based upon conflict jurisdiction. After further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. We also decline to address the remaining points raised on appeal as they are beyond the scope of the alleged conflict and do not form an independent basis of jurisdiction before this Court. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goodman v. Temple Shir Ami, Inc., 737 So. 2d 1077, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 382, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 1182, 1999 WL 459752 (Fla. 1999).
737 So. 2d 1077 (Goodman v. Temple Shir Ami, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Heard v. Johnson
810 A.2d 871 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
House of God v. White
792 So. 2d 491 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Jane Doe I v. Malicki
771 So. 2d 545 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)