Goodman v. Hanseman

2012 Ohio 1587, 132 Ohio St. 3d 23
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 12, 2012·No. 2010-2159·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} To have appellate standing, a party must be “ ‘aggrieved by the final order appealed from.’ ” State ex rel. Merrill v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, 130 Ohio St.3d 30, 2011-Ohio-4612, 955 N.E.2d 935, ¶ 28, quoting Ohio Contract Carriers Assn., Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm., 140 Ohio St. 160, 42 N.E.2d 758 (1942), syllabus. Accord State ex rel. Gabriel v. Youngstown, 75 Ohio St.3d 618, 665 N.E.2d 209 (1996). Appellees, the cross-appellants below, did not have standing to appeal the decision of the trial court. Accordingly, the portion of the court of appeals decision concerning the powers of the Division of Securities is vacated.

So ordered.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodman v. Hanseman, 2012 Ohio 1587, 132 Ohio St. 3d 23 (Ohio 2012).

2012 Ohio 1587 (Goodman v. Hanseman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re D.D.
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2026
In re D.K.
2024 Ohio 1149 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2024)
In re E.E.D.
2022 Ohio 4014 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)
In re AN.M.
2022 Ohio 2873 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)