Goodman v. Ellsworth

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7668

THURMAN RUDOLPH GOODMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

A. ELLSWORTH, Shift Sergeant/CEO; A. JONES, Floor Deputy; A. HILLS, Medical CEO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-579)

Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 16, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thurman Rudolph Goodman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Thurman Rudolph Goodman appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action as frivolous

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Goodman v. Ellsworth, No. CA-04-579 (E.D. Va. Oct. 6,

2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -