Goodman v. Ellsworth
This text of Goodman v. Ellsworth (Goodman v. Ellsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7668
THURMAN RUDOLPH GOODMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
A. ELLSWORTH, Shift Sergeant/CEO; A. JONES, Floor Deputy; A. HILLS, Medical CEO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-579)
Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 16, 2005
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thurman Rudolph Goodman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Thurman Rudolph Goodman appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action as frivolous
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Goodman v. Ellsworth, No. CA-04-579 (E.D. Va. Oct. 6,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Goodman v. Ellsworth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodman-v-ellsworth-ca4-2005.