Goodlin v. United States

2009 DNH 117
District Court, D. New Hampshire·Decided August 3, 2009·No. 09-CV-252-SM·Published

Opinion

Goodlin v. United States 09-CV-252-SM 08/03/09 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Joyce Goodlin, Petitioner

v. Civil No. 09-CV-252-SM Opinion No. 2009 DNH 117

United States of America.

Respondent

O R D E R

The petition for sentence relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 is necessarily denied.

Petitioner argues that full restitution should not have been ordered as part of her criminal sentence, given her inability to pay. Applicable statutory provisions, however, require that "the court shall order restitution to each victim in the full amount of each victim's losses as determined by the court and without consideration of the economic circumstances of the defendant." 18 U.S.C. § 36 6 4 (f)(1)(A).

Otherwise, petitioner seeks a "compassionate reduction of her sentence," but the applicable statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(I), vests absolute discretion in the Director of the Bureau of Prisons to seek, or not seek early release of an inmate for "extraordinary and compelling" reasons. Petitioner must pursue her request for compassionate release administratively through the Bureau of Prisons.

The petition and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the petitioner is entitled to no relief under Section 2255, and the petition is hereby denied. The clerk shall close the case.

SO ORDERED.

S'reven J/ McAuliffe

Chief Judge

August 3, 2 0 09 cc: Joyce Goodlin, pro se

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodlin v. United States, 2009 DNH 117 (D.N.H. 2009).

2009 DNH 117 (Goodlin v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related