Goodlin v. United States
This text of 2009 DNH 117 (Goodlin v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Goodlin v. United States 09-CV-252-SM 08/03/09 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Joyce Goodlin, Petitioner
v. Civil No. 09-CV-252-SM Opinion No. 2009 DNH 117 United States of America. Respondent
O R D E R
The petition for sentence relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 is necessarily denied.
Petitioner argues that full restitution should not have been
ordered as part of her criminal sentence, given her inability to
pay. Applicable statutory provisions, however, require that "the
court shall order restitution to each victim in the full amount
of each victim's losses as determined by the court and without
consideration of the economic circumstances of the defendant."
18 U.S.C. § 36 6 4 (f)(1)(A).
Otherwise, petitioner seeks a "compassionate reduction of
her sentence," but the applicable statute, 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(I), vests absolute discretion in the Director of
the Bureau of Prisons to seek, or not seek early release of an
inmate for "extraordinary and compelling" reasons. Petitioner
must pursue her request for compassionate release
administratively through the Bureau of Prisons. The petition and the files and records of the case
conclusively show that the petitioner is entitled to no relief
under Section 2255, and the petition is hereby denied. The clerk
shall close the case.
SO ORDERED.
S'reven J/ McAuliffe Chief Judge
August 3, 2 0 09
cc: Joyce Goodlin, pro se
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2009 DNH 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodlin-v-united-states-nhd-2009.