Goodings v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-141V Filed: June 16, 2014
************************* PAIGE S. GOODINGS, * * * Petitioner, * Notice of Dismissal; * Vaccine Rule 21(a); No Judgment; * Order Concluding Proceedings v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * HUMAN SERVICES * * Respondent. * * ************************* ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1
On June 16, 2014, Petitioner filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal in the above- captioned case.
Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21 (a) the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman Special Master
1 Because this unpublished Order contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post this Order on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information, that satisfies the criteria in § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, I will delete such material from public access.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goodings v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Goodings v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.