GOOD v. HOLLIBAUGH

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided September 10, 2024·No. 5:23-cv-04319·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CRAIG GOOD, Case No. 5:23-cv-04319-JDW ,

v.

KEN HOLLIBAUGH, et al.,

ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2024, upon consideration of the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By A Person In State Custody (ECF No. 1), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Petitioner’s Objections To Report And Recommendation (ECF No. 21) are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation dated May 24, 2024 (ECF No. 17) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 3. The Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By A Person In State Custody (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; and 4. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of this ruling ( 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed. BY THE COURT:

JOSHUA D. WOLSON, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GOOD v. HOLLIBAUGH, (E.D. Pa. 2024).

GOOD v. HOLLIBAUGH (GOOD v. HOLLIBAUGH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slack v. McDaniel
529 U.S. 473 (Supreme Court, 2000)