GOOD v. HOLLIBAUGH
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CRAIG GOOD, Case No. 5:23-cv-04319-JDW ,
v.
KEN HOLLIBAUGH, et al.,
ORDER
AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2024, upon consideration of the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By A Person In State Custody (ECF No. 1), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Petitioner’s Objections To Report And Recommendation (ECF No. 21) are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation dated May 24, 2024 (ECF No. 17) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 3. The Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By A Person In State Custody (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; and 4. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of this ruling ( 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).
The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed. BY THE COURT:
JOSHUA D. WOLSON, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
GOOD v. HOLLIBAUGH (GOOD v. HOLLIBAUGH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.