GOOD v. HOLLIBAUGH
This text of GOOD v. HOLLIBAUGH (GOOD v. HOLLIBAUGH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CRAIG GOOD, Case No. 5:23-cv-04319-JDW ,
v.
KEN HOLLIBAUGH, et al.,
ORDER
AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2024, upon consideration of the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By A Person In State Custody (ECF No. 1), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Petitioner’s Objections To Report And Recommendation (ECF No. 21) are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation dated May 24, 2024 (ECF No. 17) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 3. The Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By A Person In State Custody (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; and 4. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of this ruling ( 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).
The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed. BY THE COURT:
JOSHUA D. WOLSON, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
GOOD v. HOLLIBAUGH, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/good-v-hollibaugh-paed-2024.