Gonzalez v. Worrell
739 S.E.2d 552, 366 N.C. 501, 2013 WL 1502947, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 338
Opinion
Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gonzalez v. Worrell, 739 S.E.2d 552, 366 N.C. 501, 2013 WL 1502947, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 338 (N.C. 2013).
739 S.E.2d 552 (Gonzalez v. Worrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goldston v. State
700 S.E.2d 223 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2010)
Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary
716 S.E.2d 849 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2011)
Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary
716 S.E.2d 849 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2011)