Gonzalez v. Suffolk County Department of Social Services Child Protective Services

54 A.D.3d 341, 861 N.Y.S.2d 595
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 5, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 54 A.D.3d 341 (Gonzalez v. Suffolk County Department of Social Services Child Protective Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gonzalez v. Suffolk County Department of Social Services Child Protective Services, 54 A.D.3d 341, 861 N.Y.S.2d 595 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Office of Children and Family Services dated July 12, 2006, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s request to amend a report maintained by the respondent New York State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment as unfounded or to have his name expunged from the respondent New York State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The record contains substantial evidence to support the determination by the respondent New York State Office of Children and Family Services that the petitioner committed acts of sexual abuse and maltreatment (see Matter of Steward v Mulligan, 47 AD3d 822, 823 [2008]; Matter of Patterson v State of N.Y. Off. of Children & Family Servs., 34 AD3d 684 [2006]; Matter of Sheomber v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 22 AD3d 761, 762 [2005]). While the bulk of the proof submitted by the respondent Suffolk County Department of Social Services Child Protective Services constituted hearsay, it was sufficient to serve as the basis for the determination that the petitioner committed acts of sexual abuse and maltreatment (see Matter of Steward v Mulligan, 47 AD3d at 823).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Rivera, J.P., Lifson, Covello and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frimpong-Badu v. Carrion
85 A.D.3d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Febles v. Dutchess County Department of Social Services Child Protective Services
68 A.D.3d 993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.3d 341, 861 N.Y.S.2d 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-suffolk-county-department-of-social-services-child-protective-nyappdiv-2008.