Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Gonzalez v. State

Gonzalez v. State

411 S.E.2d 345, 201 Ga. App. 437, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1452
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 8, 1991
DocketA91A1125
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 411 S.E.2d 345 (Gonzalez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gonzalez v. State, 411 S.E.2d 345, 201 Ga. App. 437, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1452 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Andrews, Judge.

In 1984 Gonzalez was convicted on both counts of a two count indictment for conspiring to traffic in cocaine (count I), and conspiring to traffic in marijuana (count II). He received a sentence of 16 years to serve and a fine of $250,000 on count I, and 10 years to serve and a fine of $25,000 on count II. Both convictions were affirmed on appeal by this court in Gonzalez v. State, 175 Ga. App. 217 (333 SE2d 132) (1985). In November 1990 in the trial court where he was *438 sentenced, Gonzalez filed a motion to vacate the fines. He appeals pro se from the trial court’s denial of the motion.

Decided October 8, 1991. Guillermo Gonzalez, pro se. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

No issue was raised as to the fines on the previous appeal. The trial court denied the motion stating that it had no authority to modify the sentences after the term in which they were imposed. “[A] superior court judge cannot modify sentence after the expiration of the term of court at which the sentence was imposed. However, if the sentence imposed was a void sentence, then a new and valid sentence can be imposed by the trial judge at any time.” (Punctuation and citations omitted.) McCranie v. State, 157 Ga. App. 110, 111 (276 SE2d 263) (1981).

Both of the fines imposed were unauthorized and void. Under OCGA § 16-13-33, the offenses of conspiracy to traffic in cocaine and marijuana are punishable by imprisonment not exceeding the maximum term prescribed for the offenses which were the objects of the conspiracy, but the Code section contains no provision for imposition of a fine. Holbert v. State, 177 Ga. App. 461 (340 SE2d 25) (1986). A fine may be otherwise imposed under OCGA § 17-10-8 on any person convicted of a felony as a condition of probation, but no part of the present sentences was probated so this Code section does not apply. Etchison v. State, 175 Ga. App. 723, 724 (334 SE2d 324) (1985). Since the controlling statute did not authorize imposition of the fines they were void, and this issue was properly raised by the defendant’s motion to vacate the fines. Holbert, supra at 462; Raftis v. State, 175 Ga. App. 893, 898 (334 SE2d 857) (1985).

Accordingly, the trial court erred by denying the motion to vacate. Both fines must be set aside.

Judgment reversed and case remanded for resentencing.

Sognier, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. State
687 S.E.2d 221 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
Kaiser v. State
646 S.E.2d 84 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
Reynolds v. State
611 S.E.2d 750 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2005)
Watson v. State
576 S.E.2d 897 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)
Watson v. State
570 S.E.2d 30 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
Jordan v. State
559 S.E.2d 528 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
Sledge v. State
537 S.E.2d 753 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Burruss v. State
529 S.E.2d 375 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Williams v. State
523 S.E.2d 857 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)
Penney v. State
511 S.E.2d 275 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
White v. State
505 S.E.2d 228 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Shaw v. State
504 S.E.2d 18 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Lockhart v. State
489 S.E.2d 594 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Jarrett v. State
458 S.E.2d 414 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
Day v. State
453 S.E.2d 73 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
Null v. State
441 S.E.2d 82 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
Williams v. State
431 S.E.2d 469 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Gonzalez v. Abbott
424 S.E.2d 272 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1993)
Jefferson v. State
423 S.E.2d 425 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
411 S.E.2d 345, 201 Ga. App. 437, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-state-gactapp-1991.