Williams v. State
This text of 515 S.E.2d 841 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Temeka Williams, and her co-defendant, Lawanda [205]*205Michelle Ward, were jointly tried and convicted of felony murder stemming from an altercation that occurred on November 18, 1995.1 On appeal, Williams contends, among other things, that the trial court erred in charging on the meaning of reasonable doubt. For the reasons that follow, we reverse Williams’s conviction for felony murder.
1. We recently decided Ward’s appeal, and reversed her felony murder conviction based upon the same charge on reasonable doubt that is the subject of Williams’s first enumeration of error.2 Accordingly, it is necessary that we reverse Williams’s felony murder conviction because of the error in this charge.3
2. Reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found Williams guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes for which she was convicted.4
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
515 S.E.2d 841, 271 Ga. 204, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 2150, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-ga-1999.