Gonzalez v. H.K. Second Ave Restaurant Inc.

S.D. New York

Gonzalez v. H.K. Second Ave Restaurant Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 26, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-04271·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK USDC SDNY DOCUMENT LUIS A. GONZALEZ, and JULIO ELECTRONICALLY FILED SANCHEZ ESPINOZA, individually and on DOC #: behalf of others similarly situated, DATE FILED:_ 10/26/2020 Plaintiffs, 1:20-cv-04271 (MKV) ~against- ORDER OF H.K. SECOND AVE RESTAURANT INC. DISMISSAL d/b/a BAIT & HOOK, SHAHEEN KHAN, and MAHA KHONDOKER, Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Complaint in this action was filed on June 4, 2020 [ECF #1]. Executed summonses were filed on the docket on July 24, 2020 and September 25, 2020, reflecting service on July 21, 2020 and July 22, 2020 [ECF #11-13]. Defendants’ responses to the complaint were due by August 12, 2020. No responses were filed, and Plaintiff has not prosecuted this case to date. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued for failure to prosecute without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the application to restore the action is made by November 25, 2020. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See LeSane v. Hall’s Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001) (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630 (1962)).

Date: October 26, 2020 MARY/KAY VY$KOC New York, NY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK USDC SDNY DOCUMENT LUIS A. GONZALEZ, and JULIO ELECTRONICALLY FILED SANCHEZ ESPINOZA, individually and on DOC #: behalf of others similarly situated, DATE FILED:_ 10/26/2020 Plaintiffs, 1:20-cv-04271 (MKV) ~against- ORDER OF H.K. SECOND AVE RESTAURANT INC. DISMISSAL d/b/a BAIT & HOOK, SHAHEEN KHAN, and MAHA KHONDOKER, Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Complaint in this action was filed on June 4, 2020 [ECF #1]. Executed summonses were filed on the docket on July 24, 2020 and September 25, 2020, reflecting service on July 21, 2020 and July 22, 2020 [ECF #11-13]. Defendants’ responses to the complaint were due by August 12, 2020. No responses were filed, and Plaintiff has not prosecuted this case to date. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued for failure to prosecute without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the application to restore the action is made by November 25, 2020. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See LeSane v. Hall’s Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001) (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630 (1962)).

Date: October 26, 2020 MARY/KAY VY$KOC New York, NY United States District Judge

Gonzalez v. H.K. Second Ave Restaurant Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Gonzalez v. H.K. Second Ave Restaurant Inc. (Gonzalez v. H.K. Second Ave Restaurant Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related