Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided February 4, 2022·No. 8:21-cv-00877·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

TRACY LYNN GONZALEZ,

Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:21-cv-877-VMC-AAS

KILOLO KIJAKAZI,1 Commissioner, Social Security Administration,

Defendant. ______________________________________/ ORDER

Tracy Lynn Gonzalez moves for attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. Section 2412. (Doc. 16). The Commissioner does not oppose the motion. (Id. at p. 4). Ms. Gonzalez requests $1,451.64 in attorney’s fees. The EAJA permits awards for reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to a prevailing party against the United States. 28 U.S.C. § 2412. A November 8, 2021 order remanded the case to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. 14). The Clerk entered judgment in

1 Kilolo Kijakazi is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security and is automatically substituted as a party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). See also section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 USC 405(g) (action survives regardless of any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security). 1 favor of Ms. Gonzalez. (Doc. 15). The Commissioner does not contest the following: Ms. Gonzalez is the

prevailing party; Ms. Gonzalez’s net worth was less than $2 million when she filed her complaint; the Commissioner’s position was not substantially justified; and the Commissioner has no objection to the requested award of attorney’s fees. A court should grant a Social Security claimant’s request for

attorney’s fees when it is unopposed. See Jones v. Colvin, No. 8:13-cv-2900- VMC-AEP, 2015 WL 7721334 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 30, 2015) (awarding unopposed attorney’s fees request). No special circumstances make an attorney’s fees award in this matter unjust. Thus, Ms. Gonzalez is entitled to $1,451.64 in

attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees awarded to a claimant under the EAJA can be offset to satisfy the claimant’s pre-existing debt to the United States. Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 589 (2010). Following this order, the United States Department

of the Treasury will determine whether Ms. Gonzalez owes a debt to the United States. Ms. Gonzalez assigned her rights to EAJA fees to her attorney. (Doc. 16, Ex. A). If Ms. Gonzalez has no federal debt, the United States will accept her assignment of EAJA fees and pay the fees directly to counsel.

Accordingly, Ms. Gonzalez’s motion for attorney’s fees under the EAJA (Doc. 19) is GRANTED. Ms. Gonzalez is awarded $1,451.64 in attorney’s fees. 2 ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on February 4, 2022. Aranda. Arno Sasone_ AMANDA ARNOLD SANSONE United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security, (M.D. Fla. 2022).

Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security (Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)