Gonzales v. Social Security Administration

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided April 23, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-00434·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO STEVEN G. GONZALES, Plaintiff, V. CV No. 19-434 CG ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, with Memorandum in Support (the “Motion’), (Doc. 27), filed April 22, 2020. The Court, having reviewed the Motion and noting it is unopposed, finds the Motion is well-taken and shall be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that attorney fees are awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), payable to Plaintiff but mailed to Plaintiff's attorney in the amount of $4,653.50. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) (EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff's counsel receives attorney fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiff's counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). IT IS SO ORDERED. (2M7ZS— THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gonzales v. Social Security Administration, (D.N.M. 2020).

Gonzales v. Social Security Administration (Gonzales v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related