Golfro Realty Corp. v. Commissioner

Board of Tax Appeals

Golfro Realty Corp. v. Commissioner

20 B.T.A. 426, 1930 BTA LEXIS 2118

CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals

DecidedJuly 31, 1930

DocketDocket No. 40917.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 B.T.A. 426 (Golfro Realty Corp. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Golfro Realty Corp. v. Commissioner, 20 B.T.A. 426, 1930 BTA LEXIS 2118 (bta 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

[427]*427OPINION.

Artjnbell:

Under the provisions of section 234 (a) (1) of .the Revenue Act of 1924 petitioner is entitled to deduct from gross [428]*428income “a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services actually rendered.”

In Woodcliff Silk Mills, 1 B. T. A. 715, we said:

The fact tliat salaries paid to its officers by a corporation are in direct proportion to tbe stockholdings of the respective officers is strong evidence of an intent to distribute profits as salaries and must be overcome by clear evidence showing that the salaries are reasonable in amount and actually represent compensation for personal services rendered.

During the period for which the alleged salaries were paid the petitioner conducted no business transactions other than negotiations. with architects and others with a view to erecting a hotel on, and for the sale of, the Albany property, and in carrying out these activities Gold and Frost devoted only an average of two days a week of their time. The officers had other business activities. Gold owned, managed and operated seven stores for the sale of ladies’ apparel and Frost, in addition to conducting an accounting business, devoted part of his time to the activities of a corporation in which he held the controlling interest. Petitioner had no income in 1925 other than the profit realized on the sale of the Albany property, all of which, excepting $5,665.17, was paid to Gold and Frost in direct proportion to their stockholdings. The sum paid was duly voted by petitioner’s directors, consisting of Gold and Frost and their wives, but the authorization does not appear to have been one resulting from negotiations conducted at arm’s length such as is ordinarily done between employer and employee. We think the evidence sustains the conclusion of respondent that the payments were distributions of profits in the guise of salaries.

Decision will he entered for the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[427]*427OPINION.

Artjnbell:

Under the provisions of section 234 (a) (1) of .the Revenue Act of 1924 petitioner is entitled to deduct from gross [428]*428income “a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services actually rendered.”

In Woodcliff Silk Mills, 1 B. T. A. 715, we said:

The fact tliat salaries paid to its officers by a corporation are in direct proportion to tbe stockholdings of the respective officers is strong evidence of an intent to distribute profits as salaries and must be overcome by clear evidence showing that the salaries are reasonable in amount and actually represent compensation for personal services rendered.

During the period for which the alleged salaries were paid the petitioner conducted no business transactions other than negotiations. with architects and others with a view to erecting a hotel on, and for the sale of, the Albany property, and in carrying out these activities Gold and Frost devoted only an average of two days a week of their time. The officers had other business activities. Gold owned, managed and operated seven stores for the sale of ladies’ apparel and Frost, in addition to conducting an accounting business, devoted part of his time to the activities of a corporation in which he held the controlling interest. Petitioner had no income in 1925 other than the profit realized on the sale of the Albany property, all of which, excepting $5,665.17, was paid to Gold and Frost in direct proportion to their stockholdings. The sum paid was duly voted by petitioner’s directors, consisting of Gold and Frost and their wives, but the authorization does not appear to have been one resulting from negotiations conducted at arm’s length such as is ordinarily done between employer and employee. We think the evidence sustains the conclusion of respondent that the payments were distributions of profits in the guise of salaries.

Decision will he entered for the respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 B.T.A. 426, 1930 BTA LEXIS 2118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golfro-realty-corp-v-commissioner-bta-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack