Goldstein v. Connecticut General Life Insurance
This text of 7 N.E.2d 700 (Goldstein v. Connecticut General Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence shows that the insured was permanently and totally disabled as defined in the policies. It is, therefore, unnecessary to determine whether the definition formulated by the courts below accurately explained the language of the policies.
The judgments should be affirmed, with one bill of costs.
Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur.
Judgments affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 N.E.2d 700, 273 N.Y. 578, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-connecticut-general-life-insurance-ny-1937.