Goldstein v. Alweiss

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldstein v. Alweiss

196 Misc. 513, 93 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3013

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedOctober 6, 1949

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 196 Misc. 513 (Goldstein v. Alweiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldstein v. Alweiss, 196 Misc. 513, 93 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Without landlord’s permission, tenant attached a television aerial to the outside frame of a window in his apartment. The window is located one flight up and directly above the entrance to the building. The aerial was affixed to the frame by bolts and extends outwardly away from the building for a distance of about a foot and a half. Under these facts and circumstances, the erection and maintenance of this structure constitutes an unauthorized intrusion or squatting upon the landlord’s property within the purview of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act.

The final order should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $30 costs to the landlord, and final order directed for landlord as prayed for in the petition.

Steinbrink, Fennelly and Rubenstein, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Without landlord’s permission, tenant attached a television aerial to the outside frame of a window in his apartment. The window is located one flight up and directly above the entrance to the building. The aerial was affixed to the frame by bolts and extends outwardly away from the building for a distance of about a foot and a half. Under these facts and circumstances, the erection and maintenance of this structure constitutes an unauthorized intrusion or squatting upon the landlord’s property within the purview of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act.

The final order should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $30 costs to the landlord, and final order directed for landlord as prayed for in the petition.

Steinbrink, Fennelly and Rubenstein, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 Misc. 513, 93 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-alweiss-nyappterm-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack