Dudic Holding Corp. v. Feinstein

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Dudic Holding Corp. v. Feinstein

205 Misc. 42, 129 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1953 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2729

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 10, 1953·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The installation and maintenance by the tenant of an air conditioning unit projecting beyond the building wall is an intrusion or squatting upon the landlord’s property within [43] the purview of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act (Joan Bldg. Corp. v. Gould, 276 App. Div. 765; Tuchfeld v. Annenberg, N. Y. L. J. May 18, 1951, p. 1849, col. 5; Thatford Stone Corp. v. Sassano, N. Y. L. J., June 27, 1952, p. 2521, col. 2; Goldstein v. Alweiss, 196 Misc. 513; Prestipino v. Matarazzo, 99 N. Y. S. 2d 606; Kaplan v. Sessler, 197 Misc. 270). Insofar as Taft Constr. Corp. v. Bachnoff (107 N. Y. S. 2d 898, affd. 116 N. Y. S. 2d 67) is to the contrary, we must decline to follow it.

The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to the landlord and final order directed for the landlord as prayed for in the petition.

Walsh, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The installation and maintenance by the tenant of an air conditioning unit projecting beyond the building wall is an intrusion or squatting upon the landlord’s property within [43] the purview of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act (Joan Bldg. Corp. v. Gould, 276 App. Div. 765; Tuchfeld v. Annenberg, N. Y. L. J. May 18, 1951, p. 1849, col. 5; Thatford Stone Corp. v. Sassano, N. Y. L. J., June 27, 1952, p. 2521, col. 2; Goldstein v. Alweiss, 196 Misc. 513; Prestipino v. Matarazzo, 99 N. Y. S. 2d 606; Kaplan v. Sessler, 197 Misc. 270). Insofar as Taft Constr. Corp. v. Bachnoff (107 N. Y. S. 2d 898, affd. 116 N. Y. S. 2d 67) is to the contrary, we must decline to follow it.

The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to the landlord and final order directed for the landlord as prayed for in the petition.

Walsh, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.

Dudic Holding Corp. v. Feinstein, 205 Misc. 42, 129 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1953 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

205 Misc. 42 (Dudic Holding Corp. v. Feinstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related