Home/New York Court of Appeals/Goldstein, Goldman, Kessler & Underberg v. 4000 East River Road Associates

Goldstein, Goldman, Kessler & Underberg v. 4000 East River Road Associates

400 N.E.2d 1348, 48 N.Y.2d 890, 424 N.Y.S.2d 896, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2510
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 11, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 400 N.E.2d 1348 (Goldstein, Goldman, Kessler & Underberg v. 4000 East River Road Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldstein, Goldman, Kessler & Underberg v. 4000 East River Road Associates, 400 N.E.2d 1348, 48 N.Y.2d 890, 424 N.Y.S.2d 896, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2510 (N.Y. 1979).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (64 AD2d 484).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg. Judges Gabrielli and Meyer dissent and vote to reverse for reasons stated in the dissenting *892 opinion by Mr. Justice Richard J. Card amone at the Appellate Division (64 AD2d, at pp 489-491). \

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Drezin v. Delisser
17 Misc. 3d 706 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)
City of Troy v. Capital District Sports, Inc.
305 A.D.2d 715 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Indosuez v. Sopwith Holdings Corp.
772 N.E.2d 1112 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
Expo Electronics, Ltd. v. 46 Estates Corp.
222 A.D.2d 288 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Ins. Corp. of Hannover v. LATINO AMERICANA
868 F. Supp. 520 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Insurance Corp. v. Latino Americana de Reaseguros, S.A.
868 F. Supp. 520 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Rosenman & Colin v. Richard
850 F.2d 57 (Second Circuit, 1988)
In Matter of Petition of Rosenman & Colin, Appellee-Cross-Appellant, for an Adjudication of Its Rights in the Matter of Sherrier v. Richard. Rosenman & Colin, Cross-Appellant, Julian Sherrier v. Bernice Richard, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee
850 F.2d 57 (Second Circuit, 1988)
Greenberg v. State
128 A.D.2d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Golden v. Whittemore
125 A.D.2d 942 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Kaplan v. Reuss
113 A.D.2d 184 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Kaplan v. Port Taxi, Inc.
89 A.D.2d 577 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
400 N.E.2d 1348, 48 N.Y.2d 890, 424 N.Y.S.2d 896, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-goldman-kessler-underberg-v-4000-east-river-road-associates-ny-1979.