Golden v. Whittemore
This text of 125 A.D.2d 942 (Golden v. Whittemore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In 1982 petitioner represented respondent in an action for divorce and was never paid $2,459 in attorney’s fees. Pursuant to the settlement of that action, respondent continues to own an undivided one-half interest in the marital residence. In 1983, respondent’s debts, including petitioner’s attorney’s fees, were discharged in bankruptcy. Petitioner now seeks to impress a lien against the marital residence pursuant to Judiciary Law § 475. Special Term properly dismissed the petition. Since respondent already owned the marital residence, no proceeds were created and thus no charging lien attaches to this realty. (Ekelman v Maraño, 251 NY 173, 176; Goldstein, Goldman, Kessler & Underberg v 4000 E. Riv. Rd. Assoc., 64 AD2d 484, 487, affd 48 NY2d 890; Matter of Desmond v Socha, 38 AD2d 22, 24, affd 31 NY2d 687). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Roy, J. — lien for attorney’s fees.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 A.D.2d 942, 510 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 63115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golden-v-whittemore-nyappdiv-1986.