Goldstein, Garber & Salama, LLC v. J. B.

808 S.E.2d 913, 344 Ga. App. 110
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 11, 2017·No. A15A1491·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McFadden, Presiding Judge.

In Goldstein, Garber & Salama, LLC v. J.B., 335 Ga. App. 416, 779 S.E.2d 484 (2015), we affirmed the trial court's denial of the appellant/defendant's motion for a directed verdict following a jury verdict in favor of the appellee/plaintiff. In Goldstein, Garber & Salama, LLC v. J.B., 300 Ga. 840, 797 S.E.2d 87 (2017), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed our decision. Therefore, we vacate our earlier opinion, we adopt in its place the Supreme Court's opinion in *914Goldstein, Garber & Salama, LLC v. J.B., 300 Ga. 840, 797 S.E.2d 87, and we reverse the judgment below.

Judgment reversed.

Dillard, C. J., Barnes, P. J., Ellington, P. J., Ray, McMillian and Reese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldstein, Garber & Salama, LLC v. J. B., 808 S.E.2d 913, 344 Ga. App. 110 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

808 S.E.2d 913 (Goldstein, Garber & Salama, LLC v. J. B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related