Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Goldschmidt v. New York Steam Co.

Goldschmidt v. New York Steam Co.

40 N.Y.S. 1143
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 29, 1896·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In view of the nature of the business in which the defendant in this action was engaged, and the quasi public character of its services, and the inconvenience to a portion of the public which would have resulted from the granting of a preliminary injunction in this action at the season of the year at which it was applied for, we are of the opinion that the _ court below was justified in denying the motion; and for that reason the order appealed from should be affirmed, without costs to either party, but with leave to the plaintiff to renew his motion for a preliminary injunction, provided such renewal is made within a reasonable time after the announcement of our decision upon this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldschmidt v. New York Steam Co., 40 N.Y.S. 1143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

40 N.Y.S. 1143 (Goldschmidt v. New York Steam Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bodeker v. New York Steam Co.
40 N.Y.S. 1140 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)