Goldschmidt v. New York Steam Co.
This text of 40 N.Y.S. 1143 (Goldschmidt v. New York Steam Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In view of the nature of the business in which the defendant in this action was engaged, and the quasi public character of its services, and the inconvenience to a portion of the public which would have resulted from the granting of a preliminary injunction in this action at the season of the year at which it was applied for, we are of the opinion that the _ court below was justified in denying the motion; and for that reason the order appealed from should be affirmed, without costs to either party, but with leave to the plaintiff to renew his motion for a preliminary injunction, provided such renewal is made within a reasonable time after the announcement of our decision upon this appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 N.Y.S. 1143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldschmidt-v-new-york-steam-co-nyappdiv-1896.