Goldman v. Sontag
259 A.D. 949, 20 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7397
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Goldman v. Sontag. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 A.D. 688 →
Opinion
Motion denied. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Schenck, JJ. [See post, p. 959.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldman v. Sontag, 259 A.D. 949, 20 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7397 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).
259 A.D. 949 (Goldman v. Sontag) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.