Goldman v. Sontag

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldman v. Sontag

262 A.D. 920, 29 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6473

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 920 (Goldman v. Sontag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldman v. Sontag, 262 A.D. 920, 29 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6473 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted to substitute in the decision of this court the following: Ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be and the same hereby is in all things reversed on the law and on the facts, with costs and the complaint dismissed. This dismissal is without prejudice to the amendment of the complaint to state a cause of action for damages if plaintiff so desires and is able to amend her complaint to state such cause of action in place and stead of the following paragraph: Ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be and the same hereby is in all things reversed on the law and on the facts, with costs, and a new trial as in an action for damages granted if plaintiff desires and is able to amend her complaint to state such cause of action. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ. [See 257 App. Div. 688.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted to substitute in the decision of this court the following: Ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be and the same hereby is in all things reversed on the law and on the facts, with costs and the complaint dismissed. This dismissal is without prejudice to the amendment of the complaint to state a cause of action for damages if plaintiff so desires and is able to amend her complaint to state such cause of action in place and stead of the following paragraph: Ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be and the same hereby is in all things reversed on the law and on the facts, with costs, and a new trial as in an action for damages granted if plaintiff desires and is able to amend her complaint to state such cause of action. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ. [See 257 App. Div. 688.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 920, 29 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-v-sontag-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack