Goldman v. Goldman

45 A.D.2d 719, 355 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4815
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 4, 1974·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action for separation, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 6, 1973, which granted plaintiff’s motion, inter alia, to punish defendant for contempt of court for failure to comply with an order of temporary alimony. Order modified by striking therefrom all of the decretal paragraphs, except the seventh, which awarded plaintiff a counsel fee, and by adding thereto a provision directing that an immediate trial of the issues in the case take place in June, 1974, at which trial plaintiff may renew her application to punish for contempt. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. A prompt trial is the means to resolve asserted inequities in an award of temporary alimony (Levene v. Levene, 41 A D 2d 530). At the trial the parties may adduce evidence of their respective financial circumstances and, on the basis of such evidence, the amount of permanent alimony, if any, can be determined. Hopkins, Acting P. J., MartusceHo, Gohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldman v. Goldman, 45 A.D.2d 719, 355 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

45 A.D.2d 719 (Goldman v. Goldman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sayer v. Sayer
130 A.D.2d 407 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Pieri v. Pieri
91 A.D.2d 1016 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Hahn v. Hahn
65 A.D.2d 782 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)