Goldman v. Barbieri

3 Conn. Supp. 458, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 72
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Goldman v. Barbieri. Read the opinion of the Court — 3 Conn. Super. Ct. 458
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided April 13, 1936·No. File #49364·Published

Opinion

ELLS, J.

The defense does not allege a payment or release of the mortgage or that it is not due. But it does allege in substance that the plaintiff is not the real owner of the mortgage and that Mrs. Coffey’s conveyance to him was for the sole purpose of defrauding the defendant. I cannot say upon [459]*459demurrer and without hearing any of the evidence, that a Court of Equity would not be interested or concerned in that charge. The demurrer is overruled.

Mrs. Coffey should be made a party but she cannot be brought in in the informal way adopted by counsel. The motion will be granted when presented in proper form.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldman v. Barbieri, 3 Conn. Supp. 458, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 72 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).

3 Conn. Supp. 458 (Goldman v. Barbieri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.