Goldman v. Barbieri

3 Conn. Super. Ct. 458
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided April 13, 1936·No. File No. 49364·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defense does not allege a payment or release of the mortgage or that it is not due. But it does allege in substance that the plaintiff is not the real owner of the mortgage and that Mrs. Coffey's conveyance to him was for the sole purpose of defrauding the defendant. I cannot say upon *Page 459 demurrer and without hearing any of the evidence, that a Court of Equity would not be interested or concerned in that charge. The demurrer is overruled.

Mrs. Coffey should be made a party but she cannot be brought in in the informal way adopted by counsel. The motion will be granted when presented in proper form.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldman v. Barbieri, 3 Conn. Super. Ct. 458 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).

3 Conn. Super. Ct. 458 (Goldman v. Barbieri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Celentano v. Home Insurance Company, No. Cv91-034227 (Nov. 6, 1992)
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 11145 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1992)