Goldman v. Barbieri

3 Conn. Super. Ct. 458
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedApril 13, 1936
DocketFile No. 49364
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Conn. Super. Ct. 458 (Goldman v. Barbieri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldman v. Barbieri, 3 Conn. Super. Ct. 458 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

The defense does not allege a payment or release of the mortgage or that it is not due. But it does allege in substance that the plaintiff is not the real owner of the mortgage and that Mrs. Coffey's conveyance to him was for the sole purpose of defrauding the defendant. I cannot say upon *Page 459 demurrer and without hearing any of the evidence, that a Court of Equity would not be interested or concerned in that charge. The demurrer is overruled.

Mrs. Coffey should be made a party but she cannot be brought in in the informal way adopted by counsel. The motion will be granted when presented in proper form.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Celentano v. Home Insurance Company, No. Cv91-034227 (Nov. 6, 1992)
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 11145 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Conn. Super. Ct. 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-v-barbieri-connsuperct-1936.