Golden v. Golden
228 A.D.2d 184, 643 N.Y.2d 339, 643 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6371
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 6, 1996·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The Special Referee’s decision is substantially supported by the record, and we discern no reason to usurp her role as arbiter of fact and credibility (see, Dilorio v Gibson & Cushman, 204 AD2d 167; Zuekerman v Altman, 200 AD2d 520, lv denied 83 NY2d 756). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Rubin, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Golden v. Golden, 228 A.D.2d 184, 643 N.Y.2d 339, 643 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 184 (Golden v. Golden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DeLuise v. DeLuise
305 A.D.2d 142 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Suarez v. New York City Department of Probation
268 A.D.2d 203 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Anonymous v. Anonymous
233 A.D.2d 115 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)