Golden v. Golden
228 A.D.2d 184, 643 N.Y.2d 339, 643 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6371
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 6, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 228 A.D.2d 184 (Golden v. Golden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Golden v. Golden, 228 A.D.2d 184, 643 N.Y.2d 339, 643 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
Opinion
The Special Referee’s decision is substantially supported by the record, and we discern no reason to usurp her role as arbiter of fact and credibility (see, Dilorio v Gibson & Cushman, 204 AD2d 167; Zuekerman v Altman, 200 AD2d 520, lv denied 83 NY2d 756). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Rubin, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
DeLuise v. DeLuise
305 A.D.2d 142 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Suarez v. New York City Department of Probation
268 A.D.2d 203 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Anonymous v. Anonymous
233 A.D.2d 115 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 184, 643 N.Y.2d 339, 643 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golden-v-golden-nyappdiv-1996.