DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc.

204 A.D.2d 167, 614 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5359

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 204 A.D.2d 167 (DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc., 204 A.D.2d 167, 614 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5359 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered on or about March 5, 1993, which granted attorney Heller’s motion to confirm the Special Referee’s report and denied attorney Herzog’s cross motion to reject the report, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Referee’s findings were based upon a proper consideration of the factors used in determining the reasonableness of an attorney’s claim for services (see, Matter of Karp, 145 AD2d 208, 215, citing Matter of Freeman, 34 NY2d 1, 9), and substantially supported by the record (see, United States Trust Co. v Olsen, 194 AD2d 481, 482). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Kupferman, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered on or about March 5, 1993, which granted attorney Heller’s motion to confirm the Special Referee’s report and denied attorney Herzog’s cross motion to reject the report, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Referee’s findings were based upon a proper consideration of the factors used in determining the reasonableness of an attorney’s claim for services (see, Matter of Karp, 145 AD2d 208, 215, citing Matter of Freeman, 34 NY2d 1, 9), and substantially supported by the record (see, United States Trust Co. v Olsen, 194 AD2d 481, 482). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Kupferman, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 A.D.2d 167, 614 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diiorio-v-gibson-cushman-of-new-york-inc-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack