Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc.

DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc.

204 A.D.2d 167, 614 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5359
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 17, 1994·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered on or about March 5, 1993, which granted attorney Heller’s motion to confirm the Special Referee’s report and denied attorney Herzog’s cross motion to reject the report, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Referee’s findings were based upon a proper consideration of the factors used in determining the reasonableness of an attorney’s claim for services (see, Matter of Karp, 145 AD2d 208, 215, citing Matter of Freeman, 34 NY2d 1, 9), and substantially supported by the record (see, United States Trust Co. v Olsen, 194 AD2d 481, 482). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Kupferman, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc., 204 A.D.2d 167, 614 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5359 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

204 A.D.2d 167 (DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yahudaii v. Baroukhian
89 A.D.3d 557 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Barr v. Barr
232 A.D.2d 316 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Golden v. Golden
228 A.D.2d 184 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Kaplan v. Einy
209 A.D.2d 248 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)