Golden Gate Rest. Assoc. v. City and Cny of San Francisco

558 F.3d 1000, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5191, 2009 WL 605320
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 9, 2009·No. 07-17370, 07-17372·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Concurrence by Judge W. FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.

ORDER

Judge Reinhardt and Judge Fletcher voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Goodwin so recommended.

A judge of the court called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the active judges of the court failed to vote for en banc rehearing. Fed. R.App. P. 35(f). Judge Berzon was recused.

The petition for rehearing en banc, filed October 22, 2008, is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Golden Gate Rest. Assoc. v. City and Cny of San Francisco, 558 F.3d 1000, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5191, 2009 WL 605320 (9th Cir. 2009).

558 F.3d 1000 (Golden Gate Rest. Assoc. v. City and Cny of San Francisco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Insco v. Aetna Health & Life Insurance
673 F. Supp. 2d 1180 (D. Nevada, 2009)