Gold v. El Camino Mortgage Corp.
This text of 491 So. 2d 322 (Gold v. El Camino Mortgage Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
REVISED OPINION
Finding that appellee failed to serve appellants with a motion for summary judgment in advance of the trial court’s consideration of the motion at trial, as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(c), we reverse the Final Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale entered after the court granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment. Lazar v. Allen, 347 So.2d 457 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); see Cleveland Trust Co. v. Foster, 93 So.2d 112 (Fla.1957); Parker v. Lower Florida Keys Hospital District, 432 So.2d 169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
491 So. 2d 322, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gold-v-el-camino-mortgage-corp-fladistctapp-1986.