Beach Higher Power Corp. v. Capoche

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Beach Higher Power Corp. v. Capoche

763 So. 2d 551, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9715, 2000 WL 1055655

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 2, 2000

DocketNo. 3D00-655

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 763 So. 2d 551 (Beach Higher Power Corp. v. Capoche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beach Higher Power Corp. v. Capoche, 763 So. 2d 551, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9715, 2000 WL 1055655 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Beach Higher Power Corporation, defendant below, seeks to reverse a non-final order granting summary judgment in appellees’ favor. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv) and reverse.

Beach Higher Power Corporation was hand-served with Capoche Cabinets’ motion for summary judgment at commencement of trial in the underlying dispute between the parties. Because the plaintiffs did not serve their motion for summary judgment at least twenty days prior to the hearing on the motion as expressly required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(c), it was error for the lower court to grant summary judgment at that time in plaintiffs’ favor. See Gold v. El [552]*552Camino Mortgage Corp., 491 So.2d 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Beach Higher Power Corporation, defendant below, seeks to reverse a non-final order granting summary judgment in appellees’ favor. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv) and reverse.

Beach Higher Power Corporation was hand-served with Capoche Cabinets’ motion for summary judgment at commencement of trial in the underlying dispute between the parties. Because the plaintiffs did not serve their motion for summary judgment at least twenty days prior to the hearing on the motion as expressly required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(c), it was error for the lower court to grant summary judgment at that time in plaintiffs’ favor. See Gold v. El [552]*552Camino Mortgage Corp., 491 So.2d 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

763 So. 2d 551, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9715, 2000 WL 1055655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beach-higher-power-corp-v-capoche-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack