Golaine v. Cardinale
This text of 395 A.2d 218 (Golaine v. Cardinale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JOSEPH GOLAINE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
S. GERALD CARDINALE, MAYOR OF THE BOROUGH OF DEMAREST, AND MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF DEMAREST, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges HALPERN, ARD and ANTELL.
*454 Mr. Richard A. Kurland argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Stein and Kurland, attorneys).
Mr. Richard D. McLaughlin argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. John A. Schepisi, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division, is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below, 142 N.J. Super. 385.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
395 A.2d 218, 163 N.J. Super. 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golaine-v-cardinale-njsuperctappdiv-1978.