Golaine v. Cardinale
395 A.2d 218, 163 N.J. Super. 453
Opinion
JOSEPH GOLAINE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
S. GERALD CARDINALE, MAYOR OF THE BOROUGH OF DEMAREST, AND MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF DEMAREST, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges HALPERN, ARD and ANTELL.
*454 Mr. Richard A. Kurland argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Stein and Kurland, attorneys).
Mr. Richard D. McLaughlin argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. John A. Schepisi, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division, is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below, 142 N.J. Super. 385.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Golaine v. Cardinale, 395 A.2d 218, 163 N.J. Super. 453 (N.J. Ct. App. 1978).
395 A.2d 218 (Golaine v. Cardinale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Board of Education v. Brown
558 A.2d 520 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)
Frye v. Inhabitants of Town of Cumberland
464 A.2d 195 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1983)
Golaine v. Cardinale
401 A.2d 252 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1979)