Goins v. State

918 So. 2d 332, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18742, 2005 WL 3179676
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Goins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 889 So. 2d 918
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 2005·No. No. 1D05-4904·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Vernon Goins petitions for a writ of habeas corpus and argues that his criminal conviction was obtained by the state’s knowing use of perjured testimony and concealment of evidence favorable to the defense. He further contends that he only recently learned of these circumstances and that he could not have discovered the facts earlier.

A collateral attack on a criminal conviction based on newly discovered evidence must be made by a motion for postconvic[333]*333tion relief filed in the trial court. Ortiz v. State, 895 So.2d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Accordingly, the instant petition is denied without prejudice to Goins’ right to pursue that remedy.

PETITION DENIED.

DAVIS, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goins v. State, 918 So. 2d 332, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18742, 2005 WL 3179676 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

918 So. 2d 332 (Goins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ortiz v. State
895 So. 2d 1100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)